Sibanye Vs Amplats

15 February 2021 By PDSNET

Right now, comparing Amplats with Sibanye is instructive for private investors – and made more interesting because:

  1. They are both mining houses producing precious metals, mainly platinum group metals.(PGM's).
  2. They have the same financial year-end (31st December).
  3. They have both recently produced trading statements for the 2020 financial year ending on 31st December 2020.
  4. They both expect to have generated about R30bn of headline earnings in that year.

It seems reasonable for these two companies in more-or-less the same business which produce about the same profit to have about the same value in the market – but they don’t. Investors see Amplats as being worth more than twice as much as Sibanye – yet they are producing about the same profits in roughly the same business.

The market capitalisation of Amplats (R442,6bn) is 2,3 times as high as that of Sibanye (R188bn). In other words, Amplats is owned 77,28% by Anglo American and it has a long track record of being a very professionally managed, blue chip mining house focused on the production of PGM's. In recent years it has moved decisively away from the complexity and cost of deep level mining towards shallower, more mechanized operations.

Sibanye has relatively recently been cobbled together by mining expert Neal Froneman, over the past 8 years, through a series of daring and brilliant acquisitions. For half of that time (until January 2016) precious metals prices were under pressure. Then the commodity cycle turned, and prices began rising.

Froneman has always been very positive about the future of precious metals and has bought up anything which was being sold for a bargain price – including some of the operations that were sold off by Amplats. He is most notable for his acquisitions of:

  1. The Stillwater palladium mine in America
  2. Lonmin after the Marikana massacre

The Stillwater acquisition loaded Sibanye’s balance sheet with debt, but it gave the company a first world palladium mine and diversified it away from its exposure to South Africa. Lonmin was bought for Sibanye shares at a very good price and came with a valuable extraction plant. It was, however, purchased when the company was on the brink of collapse.

Today, the price:earnings (P:E) multiple of Sibanye is 31,37 while that of Amplats is 24,44. On the face of it, this means that Sibanye is slightly more “highly rated” by investors than Amplats, but it is important to understand that these multiples are based on historical earnings. If we use the projected earnings of the two companies for the year ending 31st December 2020, then the forward multiple for Amplats is between 13,93 and 15,74 while that of Sibanye is between 5,95 and 6,19.

That shows that investors are prepared to pay more than twice as much for 100c of earnings from Amplats as they are for 100c of earnings from Sibanye. The reasons for this are inter alia:

  • Amplats has a much longer history of good management and profitability than Sibanye – which reduces the risk.
  • Sibanye includes some gold assets while Amplats is a pure PGM play.
  • Amplats produced almost 75% more PGM ounces than Sibanye, but Sibanye produced over 25 000 kilograms of gold as well.
  • In the 2019 year, Sibanye generated R62m in profits while Amplats generated R18bn – so investors see Sibanye’s 2020 profits as less sustainable.
  • Overall, Amplats is seen as much more stable and reliable, while Sibanye has the wild card advantage of Froneman’s evident brilliance.

Sibanye has about 2,9bn shares in issue trading at R64.84 while Amplats has 265,3m shares in issue at a price of R1668.37. So, Sibanye has about 11 times more shares in issue – mainly because of the various acquisitions which it has made for shares.

The final point to make about these two shares is their relative performance. Consider the chart of their comparative relative strength:

Comparative relative strength of Sibanye against Amplats: January 2016 - February 2021

You can see here that once the commodity cycle turned, Amplats was out-performing Sibanye by a wide margin. This was mainly because of its well-established infrastructure and good name. From about July 2019, however, Sibanye began to outperform Amplats as investors realised that Froneman’s gambles had paid off and the company was going to benefit from the strong rise in PGM prices.

Commodity shares like Sibanye and Amplats are always more volatile and risky because they are dependent on the prices of internationally traded commodities. A well-established mining house like Amplats is always going to be far less risky than a company like Sibanye which owes much of its success to one man’s brilliance.


All information and data contained within the PDSnet Articles is for informational purposes only. PDSnet makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity, of any information, and shall not be liable for any errors, omissions, or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. Information in the PDSnet Articles are based on the author’s opinion and experience and should not be considered professional financial investment advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional. Thoughts and opinions will also change from time to time as more information is accumulated. PDSnet reserves the right to delete any comment or opinion for any reason.

Share this article:


12 Year Bull Trend

On 6th March 2009, just over 12 years ago, the S&P500 index made an intra-day cycle low at 666.79. It was the end of a 17-month bear trend which had seen the S&P fall by 57,4%. The world was in the teeth of the sub-prime crisis and negativity abounded. Investors were terrified.  The response to the crisis was massive and world-wide.

The Confidential Report - April 2021

The S&P500 index closed above 4000 for the first time on Thursday 1st April 2021 at 4019.


You can see the impact of the COVID-19 V-bottom, which we regard as an extraneous non-economic factor, and the subsequent acceleration of the S&P. Obviously, the


Hammerson has been listed on the London Stock Exchange since 1945. It is a real estate investment trust (REIT) and owns “flagship destinations and premium outlets in key cities across the UK and Europe”. Most of the company’s properties are shopping malls like Brent Cross in London, The Bullring in Birmingham and Dundrum Town Center in Dublin. Obviously,

Afrimat Revisited

On 25th May 2020, ten months ago, we published an article on Afrimat in which we said we liked what the company was doing and considered it to be undervalued. At the time Afrimat shares were trading in the market for R29. In the past ten months they have risen to R46 – a gain of 58,6%. Consider the chart:



The relationship between technical analysis and fundamental analysis is the relationship between the reality and the perception of that reality in a company. The fundamentalist searches for the share’s real value by studying the company’s financials. The technician studies the impact of investors’ perceptions as they are reflected in the

OBV and Mpact

Joseph Granville, talking about the share market, famously said, “volume leads price”. By this he meant that the volume traded in a share tends to begin increasing before the price rises. He encapsulated this idea in his “On Balance Volume” technique (OBV). If you are not clear on OBV go back and re-read On

The Confidential Report - March 2021

The major change that has come about in America since the advent of the Biden administration has been a broad shift towards “risk-on”. The uncertainties associated with Trump are fading. American investors have welcomed the economic logic and sanity of the new administration with a desire to generate returns which are well above those offered by US Treasury


Naspers is the largest share on the JSE with a market capitalisation of R1,67 trillion. Naspers was founded in 1915, as a printer and publisher of newspapers and magazines. It has since evolved into an international social media, entertainment and gaming company.

This share has the problem that it is undervalued in relation


In the current environment investors should be looking for listed companies that have managed to weather the COVID-19 storm and emerged with strong growth. These companies would have had two important components before the pandemic began – a strong balance sheet and highly competent management. Hudaco had both.
Hudaco is a company with two primary divisions:

  1. The

The Confidential Report - February 2021

The relatively calm installation of Joe Biden as president and the Democratic Party’s control of Congress were appreciated with relief by markets worldwide. The S&P has risen by almost 18% from its low of 3270 on 30th October 2020 to its recent high of 3855 on 25th January 2021. Biden has promised further substantial stimulation